Saturday, June 2, 2012

So What Does This Mean For Us?



For one thing, I think people of my generation have really fallen for the spin.  The media are selling us a particular version of our own culture and it seems to be working, with more and more young people participating in Anzac Day services, possibly because we feel like we have to be seen taking part in these activities if we want to be truly "Australian" (Pacella, 2011, pp26-28).



But this has more serious consequences than just us being taken in by media hype.  Amelia Johns suggests that the Anzac Myth and its implied patriotism and opposition to the "other" actually led to the recent Cronulla Riots (2008, pp3-16).  More generally, it gets in the way of us thinking critically about war (MacCallum, 2010).



I actually discussed this issue at uni, and I was surprised that none of my classmates' comments engaged with the actual issue, i.e. the possibility that the reality of Anzac Day has been twisted to suit someone else's agenda.  Instead, people argued that I was wrong because for them, Anzac Day was simply a day to remember the people who died.  That may well be true, but isn't it interesting that people took a theoretical discussion as a personal criticism of their own behaviours and values?



That's the root of the problem here.  Because the Anzac Legend is so sacred in our society, any criticisms of it are seen as offensive to the entire Australian identity.  And when our media and politicians tie the Anzac Legend up with current conflicts, our criticisms of those conflicts start to look like criticisms of the Anzacs and of very nature of Australian-ness.  This is ultimately what's wrong with militarist cultures like ours: if the glory of war becomes a part of our national psyche, there's no room for genuine criticisms and academic debate. (MacCallum, 2010, pp152-183)











MacCallum, A 2010, "What's Wrong with Anzac", University of Melbourne

No comments:

Post a Comment